Comments on: Firefox fixed? :-) http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/ Neil Shearing's latest up-to-the-minute tips and secrets! Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:13:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Dave Navarro http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/#comment-21 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:17:19 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/#comment-21 Neil - Looking good. Glad you got it all up and running again! Dave Navarro Rapid Results Coach www.davenavarro.com/wealthblog Neil -

Looking good. Glad you got it all up and running again!

Dave Navarro
Rapid Results Coach
www.davenavarro.com/wealthblog

]]> by: The Grey Man http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/#comment-17 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:36:20 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/#comment-17 Oops! Sorry. The line of code I pasted in is missing. It should have been as follows… html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" …but with the opening and closing tag braces. Sorry. Anyway, I see you've sorted it now. Bye. Oops! Sorry. The line of code I pasted in is missing. It should have been as follows…

html xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml”

…but with the opening and closing tag braces. Sorry. Anyway, I see you’ve sorted it now. Bye.

]]> by: ChrisGreenhough http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/#comment-16 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:07:02 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/04/21/firefox-fixed/#comment-16 Hi Neil :-) Long time no speak. What am I saying? No way you'll remember me! But you were very helpful to me many years back when I was a total eBiz newbie and just dipping a toe in the water. You spent a lot of time corresponding with me by email and I really appreciated that. I'm sure you had better things to do. Now I thought I'd take the opportunity to return the favour! ;-) The code block you've quoted is essentially an instruction to the browser as to how it should interpret the html of your webpage, what dialect it's in, if you will. Some people swear by doctypes (semantic, and all that) other people keep it real simple and delete them, as you have done. Out of interest, did you also have this line... ...immediately after the doctype? And you've got the doctype before the head tags? Anyway, I hope that helps. Please get back to me if what I said is unclear. Regards, Chris G. P.S. Sadly, my previous online ventures fizzled out, largely for personal reasons. But, as my 40th birthday draws near (next week, in fact) I've promised myself that I'm going to restart the eBiz. Life begins, as they say... All the best, Neil. Hi Neil :-)

Long time no speak. What am I saying? No way you’ll remember me! But you were very helpful to me many years back when I was a total eBiz newbie and just dipping a toe in the water. You spent a lot of time corresponding with me by email and I really appreciated that. I’m sure you had better things to do.

Now I thought I’d take the opportunity to return the favour! ;-) The code block you’ve quoted is essentially an instruction to the browser as to how it should interpret the html of your webpage, what dialect it’s in, if you will. Some people swear by doctypes (semantic, and all that) other people keep it real simple and delete them, as you have done.

Out of interest, did you also have this line…

…immediately after the doctype? And you’ve got the doctype before the head tags?

Anyway, I hope that helps. Please get back to me if what I said is unclear.

Regards,
Chris G.

P.S. Sadly, my previous online ventures fizzled out, largely for personal reasons. But, as my 40th birthday draws near (next week, in fact) I’ve promised myself that I’m going to restart the eBiz. Life begins, as they say… All the best, Neil.

]]>