Comments on: Another record-breaking Adsense day… http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/ Neil Shearing's latest up-to-the-minute tips and secrets! Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:11:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Kenn http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-836 Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:52:50 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-836 Dude, you're obviously not interested, so you can stop trying to talk yourself out of the purchase, lol. And since everyone seems to forget, I'll remind you: Google is not the only search engine. Dude, you’re obviously not interested, so you can stop trying to talk yourself out of the purchase, lol. And since everyone seems to forget, I’ll remind you: Google is not the only search engine.

]]> by: Bill Kruse http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-804 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:12:30 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-804 I believe both yourself and Mike Leibner have referred to doing some reworking on the articles, yourself in response to my earlier query about possible duplicate content which was in turn mentioned I believe in Andy Williams' newsletter (or maybe Michael Campbell's, I forget which now). ML got a mention in there somewhere too. What I'm thinking of using it for is my poster site, which features posters of all sorts, and sizes and subjects, so if I have a page on Mucha then linking back to it from a fine art-oriented blog would maybe be a good idea. Similarly my pages on Picasso etc. Or, f'rinstance, my page on surfing could be lniked to from amything appropriate, my Vietnam Reflections page - lots of topics there so lots of viable links to be had, I would think. But I don't want Google, further on down the road, sniffing out the fact that a big chunk of my inbounds come from a very small set of blogs and penalising me accordingly. The obvious answer would be to do a protracted link campaign, get lots of links from all over so that my UA BLs formed only a fraction of my back links. Ah, but then the old problem returns... no time! :-) And now I'd better get on with something! BB BB I believe both yourself and Mike Leibner have referred to doing some reworking on the articles, yourself in response to my earlier query about possible duplicate content which was in turn mentioned I believe in Andy Williams’ newsletter (or maybe Michael Campbell’s, I forget which now). ML got a mention in there somewhere too.
What I’m thinking of using it for is my poster site, which features posters of all sorts, and sizes and subjects, so if I have a page on Mucha then linking back to it from a fine art-oriented blog would maybe be a good idea. Similarly my pages on Picasso etc. Or, f’rinstance, my page on surfing could be lniked to from amything appropriate, my Vietnam Reflections page - lots of topics there so lots of viable links to be had, I would think. But I don’t want Google, further on down the road, sniffing out the fact that a big chunk of my inbounds come from a very small set of blogs and penalising me accordingly.
The obvious answer would be to do a protracted link campaign, get lots of links from all over so that my UA BLs formed only a fraction of my back links. Ah, but then the old problem returns… no time! :-)
And now I’d better get on with something!

BB

BB

]]> by: Neil_Shearing http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-803 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:35:32 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-803 Hi Bill, Ahh, just testing me, eh? :-) If you follow Michael Campbell, you'll see that he strongly endorses Article Underground too. ...and who said anything about re-writing articles? BTW, I totally agree with the "more hours in the day" sentiment. That's why I bought into Rich Schefren's system. Neil. Hi Bill,

Ahh, just testing me, eh? :-)

If you follow Michael Campbell, you’ll see that he strongly endorses Article Underground too.

…and who said anything about re-writing articles?

BTW, I totally agree with the “more hours in the day” sentiment. That’s why I bought into Rich Schefren’s system.

Neil.

]]> by: Bill Kruse http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-802 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:53:40 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-802 I already know what I think, I was wondering what you think! I'm only being so picky because I do genuinely think of joining from time to time, I respect what you do, I follow Michael Campbell, Andy Williams and dip in and out of a few others, Lazy Pig, etc... but then I think, well, if I'm going to have to sit there re-writing someone else's articles perhaps I'd be better employed writing more of my own. Lack of hours in the day is my recurring problem. Anyhoo, I thank you for your prompt responses. BB :-) I already know what I think, I was wondering what you think! I’m only being so picky because I do genuinely think of joining from time to time, I respect what you do, I follow Michael Campbell, Andy Williams and dip in and out of a few others, Lazy Pig, etc… but then I think, well, if I’m going to have to sit there re-writing someone else’s articles perhaps I’d be better employed writing more of my own. Lack of hours in the day is my recurring problem. Anyhoo, I thank you for your prompt responses.

BB :-)

]]> by: Neil_Shearing http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-798 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:24:34 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-798 Bill, shouldn't you be telling me? :-) http://www.kruse.co.uk/ Bill, shouldn’t you be telling me? :-)
http://www.kruse.co.uk/

]]> by: Neil_Shearing http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-797 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:18:01 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-797 You may well be right... "my research has shown that Google now counts multiple links from a single domain as just one link when it comes to PageRank and for the ranking algorithm. Hence a sitewide link is no better than a single link on a homepage." http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/001202.html You may well be right…
“my research has shown that Google now counts multiple links from a single domain as just one link when it comes to PageRank and for the ranking algorithm. Hence a sitewide link is no better than a single link on a homepage.”
http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/001202.html

]]> by: Bill Kruse http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-795 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:10:57 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-795 In terms of traffic, getting a link from five pages on a site is a good thing. In terms of PR, though, would they not count the same as one link as they're all from the same domain? BB In terms of traffic, getting a link from five pages on a site is a good thing. In terms of PR, though, would they not count the same as one link as they’re all from the same domain?

BB

]]> by: Neil_Shearing http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-785 Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:36:48 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-785 Hi Bill, Interesting point. I think you're not noticing the extra links, though. Each time you make a post to an Article Underground blog you can select up to five categories. Your post therefore has the opportunity of being on six pages... the index page and five category pages. When you consider the fact that you're writing the post... so you control the linking text, the post content, the post title and the category selection, I think you'll find the ability to do that is very valuable. :-) ... although, not as valuable as being the only link from a PR6 on-topic page, I agree. But that would cost a lot per month for one link. :-) Use this to find out how much, roughly... http://www.text-link-ads.com/link_calculator.php Neil. Hi Bill,

Interesting point. I think you’re not noticing the extra links, though.

Each time you make a post to an Article Underground blog you can select up to five categories. Your post therefore has the opportunity of being on six pages… the index page and five category pages. When you consider the fact that you’re writing the post… so you control the linking text, the post content, the post title and the category selection, I think you’ll find the ability to do that is very valuable. :-)

… although, not as valuable as being the only link from a PR6 on-topic page, I agree. But that would cost a lot per month for one link. :-)

Use this to find out how much, roughly…
http://www.text-link-ads.com/link_calculator.php

Neil.

]]> by: Bill Kruse http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-784 Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:20:40 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2006/07/29/another-record-breaking-adsense-day/#comment-784 Another thing that kind of bothers me about AU... Mike points out, quite rightly IMHO, that for $97 a month from AU you can get any number of PR5 and PR6 links. I have to question the quality of those links though. If you and you alone have a link to your site from a thematically-related PR5 site (In AU's case I assume these are generated by commenting/announcing at blogs) then that's a great thing. What about when you have loads of people doing the same thing and commenting/announcing from the same page though? Your sole and therefore valuable link diminishes in value the more company it finds itself in, and I note further that Mike is airing the possibility of allowing complete outsiders to the AU systems to be allowed access to the link/commenting/announcing (call it what you will, it's backlinks to your own sites) facility - for a fee, of course, and fair enough that is too. Of what value will your links be then though? BB Another thing that kind of bothers me about AU… Mike points out, quite rightly IMHO, that for $97 a month from AU you can get any number of PR5 and PR6 links. I have to question the quality of those links though. If you and you alone have a link to your site from a thematically-related PR5 site (In AU’s case I assume these are generated by commenting/announcing at blogs) then that’s a great thing. What about when you have loads of people doing the same thing and commenting/announcing from the same page though? Your sole and therefore valuable link diminishes in value the more company it finds itself in, and I note further that Mike is airing the possibility of allowing complete outsiders to the AU systems to be allowed access to the link/commenting/announcing (call it what you will, it’s backlinks to your own sites) facility - for a fee, of course, and fair enough that is too.
Of what value will your links be then though?

BB

]]>