Archive for May, 2007

New video ad formats for Adsense… will they make you more money?

Thursday, May 31st, 2007

If it took Google a whole year to roll out more video ad format sizes, does that mean they work, or not? I would guess not… but then, why roll out new ad format sizes at all?

Google uses either a CPM payment model (where the site owner gets paid per thousand impressions of the static video graphic) or a cost per click model (where the site owner gets paid per clickthrough to the advertisers site. Note, the first click on the video merely acts to start the video… site owners get nothing for that click. Only a subsequent click which takes the visitor to the advertiser’s site earns the site owner money) depending on which way the advertiser has decided to pay for their ads.

Have you opted in to “image” ads… have they increased your earnings?

Worldpay says to Switch to Maestro…

Friday, May 18th, 2007

Message from online credit card processing company Worldpay to their customers…

“Over the past couple of years, Switch has been migrating to Maestro, MasterCard’s global debit brand. Switch has largely disappeared from most shop windows and this change now needs to be made online. MasterCard require all internet merchants to remove the Switch logo from their websites by 30th June 2007.”

It’s a UK thing, I believe. Just like “Access” became “Mastercard”, now “Switch” becomes “Maestro”.

Bah. I remember when “snickers” was “marathon” too. :-)

Adsense Clicks for charity?

Friday, May 18th, 2007

I’m not sure why Google would even need to clarify this, but I guess it was a frequently asked question…


“Many publishers have asked if they can place text on their sites which states that all or a portion of the earnings generated through AdSense will be donated to charity or another third party.

While we do appreciate your charitable efforts, this practice is not permitted by our program policies. We want users to click on ads because they are interested in the products or services offered by the advertiser, not because they are interested in supporting a site or a charity. Using this type of language can draw undue attention to the ads, and we aren’t able to verify whether earnings are actually donated to the third-party mentioned on each site. As a result, we don’t allow publishers to offer these types of incentives.

However, please know that once you’ve received your payments, you’re still welcome to use them however you wish - whether it’s donating them to a charity, paying your hosting bills, or treating yourself to a night out on the town. We just ask that you avoid using any language on your site that would directly or indirectly encourage users to click on your ads.”

Well, that makes sense, doesn’t it?

If you say, “click these ads please… I’ll earn cash” you’re in trouble, and if you say, “click these ads and I’ll donate some of the cash to charity… honest!”, you’re still in trouble.

Don’t ask people click to click on the ads. Don’t click them yourself. Don’t encourage people to click on the ads. Don’t suggest people click on the ads. Don’t incentivize people to click on the ads. Don’t draw attention to the ads. Don’t have any page elements (like drop-down navigation bars) near the ads.

Just put the ads on your pages and leave them. Simple really. :-)

XSitePro Version 2 is on the way…

Friday, May 18th, 2007

Good news for fans of XSitePro. According to Paul Smithson, “there are NINE programmers working on it full time and numerous others on a part-time basis.”

Wow. That’s a huge project. It seems that almost all programming projects balloon in size and scope from the original requirements, and XSitePro is no different…

“I never planned on having this volume of dedicated programming staff working on it, but when I looked at the list of new features there was no way that we’d have it ready this year without making this huge investment.”

Here’s the best part…

“Anyone who purchased XSitePro V1 within the six months prior to the release of V2 will get this major upgrade for free.”

As Version 2 is due to be released sometime around late 2007, you can effectively get the upgrade for free by buying Version 1 now. It’s “VERY likely” that Version 2 will have a higher price tag. I’m not surprised, considering the development costs Paul must be incurring!

Paul promises…

“I’m sure that V2 will be out within the next six months, so if (people) buy it now they’ll also be getting the update to V2 for free.” :-)

check out XSitePro here, and grab a copy before the price increases for version 2.

(already own XSitePro? Paul says… “Anyone who purchased the software prior to that six month period will get it at a massively reduced price - even if you bought it two years ago.”)

Brad Callen’s Free Directory Submitter…

Thursday, May 17th, 2007

I’ve just downloaded the free version of Brad Callen’s Directory Submitter. It’s a very nice piece of software… very slick. If you’re familiar with software that helps you automate submitting articles to article directories, it’s a lot like that.

The actual process of submitting your sites to directories is a right royal pain in the “you know what”. It’s only getting more difficult as sites add more hurdles such as setting up an account, adding a reciprocal link or filling in a captcha box before you can submit a URL. Lots of directories are also charging small fees before they accept a listing (usually $4 or $5). So, don’t expect submitting to directories to be a fun task.

Having said that, Brad’s software whisks you to each site and pre-populates the form fields… meaning your job is half done. And it’s free. So if you’re trying to get some one-way links from directories, check out the free software here.

You’ll need to supply your email details in order to download the software, and it mentions Brad’s other software in unobtrusive ads inside the software. Oh, and there’s an option to upgrade to “pro” for a small fee if you really want to submit to 1,700 directories! (if you do upgrade, I suggest paying an assistant to do the submissions for you!)

I highly recommended the free Directory Submitter to make the task of getting links and traffic from directories easier. :-)

Instant PageRank?

Wednesday, May 16th, 2007

If there’s a news website with “breaking news”, such as this page at Telegraph.co.uk, that page is, by definition, brand new.

So how can it have PageRank 2 already (according to my Google Toolbar)?

Does the Googlebot crawl the Telegraph (PR8) homepage so often it finds the breaking news pages almost instantly and assigns PageRank?

Or is the PageRank 8 homepage of the Telegraph powerful enough to pass instant PageRank to any page it links to, regardless of whether or not Google knows about it?

I guess, seeing as PageRank is Google’s system, it’s probably the former… but, boy, assigning PageRank to a breaking news webpage, which was either minutes or hours old is really fast! :-)

… and I thought the Toolbar was only updated every 90 days according to the SEO folks. Well, if it shows the PR for a “breaking news” webpage, it must be updated much, much more frequently than that…?

Did Ken Evoy call me a tortoise?

Wednesday, May 16th, 2007

tortoiseclick to enlarge

I just got a present in the post. (that’s one of the nice “perks” to being a top affiliate… you get really nice unexpected gifts in the post… sometimes for winning JV competitions, sometimes to solicit your participation in a product launch, sometimes just for fun.)

Ken Evoy sent me a little tortoise. He’s sitting with a cup of coffee, working on his laptop. No doubt building his e-biz empire. :-)

I know Ken checks this blog, so, thanks Ken. :-)

The message, if you can’t read it, says, “Passion… Action… Patience… Faith… Persistence. A special tortoise for a special SiteSell contributor! Wishing you much success, Ken and the SiteSell team.”

Google Adsense wants to call you?

Wednesday, May 16th, 2007

Why would Google Adsense want to verify your account using your phone number?

I’m guessing this is a North American verification system or only applies to new accounts because they haven’t asked me to verify my account this way yet. But it’s interesting that they’re using phone numbers to verify accounts. Wouldn’t that give them access to some very lucrative customer data?

And it doesn’t appear to be optional. From the graphic on the blog post, it seems that your earnings will be held until you verify your phone number (”Action is required to release payment“). I don’t see any explanation as to why you would need to verify your account using your phone number.

I seem to remember verifying my account using the PIN they sent in the mail, and verifying the test deposits into my account. I wonder if anyone is upset with the obligation to use the phone number verification system?

Testimonial time…

Tuesday, May 15th, 2007

How about this one? :-)

—-
I bought my first computer while recovering from a car accident. At the time I was on benefits & working part time as a club bouncer on a weekend for $150. One of the first things I bought online was a book which explained how to create your own products, and sell them on the Internet. I devoured that little book and went to work. Today I bank $25,000 per month from information products, drive a Mercedes SL Convertible, own 3 properties and am in demand as a consultant for the knowledge I have gained on this journey.

That first little eBook? - Neil Shearing’s Internet Success Blueprint.

Dave Shillito
Dixon Techno Ltd
www.dixontechno.com

Nice one, Dave! :-)

PayPal changes European base to Luxembourg.

Tuesday, May 15th, 2007

In an interesting development, PayPal has become a bank in Luxembourg and will migrate all their EU-based accounts to fall under the control of the new Luxembourg bank…

“PayPal was granted a bank license with the Luxembourg bank authority. Under this license, PayPal will be regulated centrally by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), the Luxembourg bank authority.

On 2 July 2007, your customer relationship will be automatically transferred from PayPal (Europe) Ltd. to PayPal Luxembourg.”
(source)

Why are they doing it? Well…

“Other eBay group companies, such as Skype and eBay, have an important presence in Luxembourg, so it makes sense for PayPal Europe to co-locate with them.”

According to PayPal, “The transfer will not affect the way you use PayPal. The only change is your customer relationship being transferred to PayPal Luxembourg.”

Which is all fine and dandy, assuming UK account holders trust the Luxembourg banking authorities as much as they trust the Financial Services Authority (FSA) based in London who PayPal are regulated by, but presumably won’t be if they re-locate to Luxembourg..

“PayPal (Europe) Ltd. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom as an electronic money institution. PayPal FSA Register Number: 226056.”

Will they still have to be FSA-registered if they want to do business in the UK? I doubt it. What with the EU supposedly having a “common market” for the free movement of goods, people and (I guess), money and the fact that “The only change is your customer relationship being transferred to PayPal Luxembourg”, we’ll be looking to Luxembourg if anything goes wrong I guess.

Did John Reese pay $2.3 million for Income.com?

Monday, May 14th, 2007

Hmmm. John Reese’s new venture, income.com, has been creating quite a buzz recently. That tends to happen when John Reese launches something new. :-)

But, I just found out that John (allegedly) paid $2.3 million for the domain name. Wow. That’s a whole lot of cash. I can’t be certain that John paid that amount for the domain because he hasn’t told me personally, but from comments at his blog, and this webpage we can see that the last bid was $2.3 million when the domain was auctioned in 2000.

Doing a little detective work, I’m not convinced (yet) that John bought the domain, or that he paid $2.3 million. For a start, the admin contact for the domain name is still “Choquette & Company Accounting Group Inc.” who I thought were the original owners. In addition, this page says that “Income.com is available for Sales, Lease or Partnership”. Of course, that page could be outdated. But, taken with the domain name admin details, it would lead me to believe that John has done a deal to use the domain without actually owning it.

All that’s hypothetical.

What I really want to know is, if income.com is worth $2.3 million, what’s the better domain name, incomemax.com worth? ;-)

(yes, incomemax.com is my domain name)

Accidental Adsense Clicks…

Friday, May 11th, 2007

Google has issued some clarifications to help webmasters decrease the chances of visitors clicking on Adsense ads accidentally.

In a nushell, don’t have any drop-down navigation menus that drop-down over Adsense ads (which would risk visitors clicking the ad rather than the navigation) and try to have a border between ads and content.

Check out the official post for graphical examples.

Get Google Ads For Free? I don’t think so…

Friday, May 11th, 2007

I just got an unsolicited email promoting “Get Google Ads For Free”. I didn’t promote the product at the time of release because, well, it’s obvious, isn’t it? ;-)

But the spam got me curious. What was all the fuss about and is the product still being sold? So I did some research… checked out the sales letter and then the discussions here and here.

It’s interesting that Clickbank is still selling a product which claims to get you Google Ads for free, but in reality seems to just suggest you pay for your ads, then defray the cost of those ads through ads you place on your landing pages. That’s arbitrage, not free ads. The arbitrage idea has been around for a while, and the margins are small to non-existant.

As one guy said on the forum… “I bought it and asked for a refund, it teachs you how to sell banner space at your sites”

Doh.

There’s a dislaimer, in small print, right at the bottom of the sales letter, which says…

“the system it involves neither has anything to do with any “AdWords™ and/or AdSense™ credits or vouchers,” nor the direct provision by Google to the customer any direct free advertising at anytime; nor any free pay-per-click or otherwise paid-for advertising directly; but rather is a system that if applied correctly and properly and effectively, and as instructed per the author’s direction, may allow for the elimination of the burden of costs pertaining to that customer’s pay-per-click and/or otherwise paid-for advertising expense(s).”

(sarcasm on) Huh? So you mean you don’t get free ads? (end sarcasm)

So, if you don’t get “free” ads, what does this mean… at the bottom of the sales page…

“Now Google pay-per-clicks are FREE using my amazing secret!”

/sigh.

I’ve sent Clickbank this question… let’s see what they say…

“Why don’t you include a “refund” percentage for products listed in the marketplace? Adding that data would sort good products from poor ones thereby helping affiliates decide which products to promote.

Please let me know your comments. I think withholding this data is detrimental to the integrity of your marketplace.”

I just found an excellent calculator here which shows you the refund rate for a Clickbank product. It takes the info Clickbank shows you in the marketplace and does the calculation. For “Get Google Ads For Free”, affiliates should earn 75% of $67 (less the Clickbank fee), which is $45.73. But the actual earning per sale figure is $37.19. From that data the calculator suggests a refund rate of 18.67%.

Ouch. That’s almost one sale in five refunded. :-(

Has Buying Links For PageRank Been Google Slapped?

Thursday, May 10th, 2007

In reference to “Did Your PageRank Go Up Or Down” which I mentioned on 2nd May, I heard today from Michael Campbell [a must-read newsletter for Internet entrepreneurs] that the possible sea change in PageRank may have been due to the penalizing of some high PageRank sites who passed along PageRank to other sites thereby creating a ripple effect of decreasing PageRank.

Michael’s hypothesis is that the penalized sites were passing PageRank in a manner that Google disapproved of… namely selling it.

“There was a big ripple effect. It’s what happens when big PR8 sites suddenly have their GoogleJuice (PageRank) turned off, because they were selling links.”

Michael goes on to say, “Now I don’t buy links. Never have. Never will.”

OK, that’s clear enough… be very careful if you try to buy PageRank… Google’s cracking down on it.

I can’t say I’ve *never* bought links, but I’ve only done it on a very limited scale… and I intend to keep it at that level. Perhaps that’s why my three main sites all stayed at PR5.

Save time promoting your blog…

Thursday, May 10th, 2007

Just a quick plug for “A blog for bloggers“. Nicolas has done a nice job listing blog directories and how they treated his blog submissions. Doing that kind of legwork takes time, so if you’re looking for directories to submit your blog to, check out Nicolas’s site and save yourself some time and effort. :-)

A review of “How To Get Rich” by Felix Dennis

Wednesday, May 9th, 2007

Wow, “How To Get Rich” was an absolute corker of a book… [amazon UK - amazon USA] …a step-by-step guide to making money by Felix Dennis who’s one of Britain’s most successful self-made millionaires. His estimated wealth is £750 million (approx $1.5 billion) according to the 2007 Times Rich List… good enough for 95th position. Although, in the book, Dennis says he doesn’t understand where they get their figures from and that even he doesn’t know exactly how much he’s worth because of the complexity involved in estimating it.

quote… “That is why so many rich people distrust the ‘rich lists’ and league tables of wealth published every so often in newspapers and magazines. We know that if we cannot calculate our true net worth, and if our paid armies of accountants cannot agree upon a figure, then compilers of lists and financial journalists certainly cannot do so with any real accuracy” [page 4].

Felix Dennis is primarily a magazine publisher. He privately owns Dennis Publishing Ltd… a UK company which publishes a range of successful magazines and has a turnover of over £200 million ($400 million per year). If you’re a Brit, you may recognize some of these titles… MacUser, Maxim, Auto Express, Computer Shopper, PC Pro and Viz. There’s also Dennis Publishing USA which has recently been put up for sale.

In his book, Dennis takes you through what it takes to get rich. It’s a great read… not only does he tell you the “nuts and bolts” of getting rich such as how to get capital, how to delegate, how to find a market, how to retain control, but he also analyzes what it takes as a person. Basically, you have to have an unyielding desire to become rich and an ability to overcome fear. Just getting out there and “doing it”. He seems to believe that most people have neither the desire nor the drive to become rich, even if they say they do… which sounds about right to me. How many people really have the killer instinct needed to compete in the capitalistic jungle… to claim the huge piles of cash needed to become rich?

But there’s much more to the book than just how to get rich. Dennis talks about his brush with Legionnaire’s disease, which almost killed him but also made him clean up his act and stop wasting his new-found money (and life) on drugs, alcohol and “expensive” women.

He has certainly amassed a huge fortune… but there’s a real sense of melancholy about the book. For someone so driven to be their own boss and become rich, there’s the inevitable question of what to do once you’ve “made it”. Especially when you have no wife or children to spend time with and share life with. Dennis indulged in drugs, booze and expensive ladies until the Legionnaire’s incident. Since then he’s taken to writing poetry and also devotes resources to planting a forest in England (the Forest of Dennis).

Dennis claims to have written “How To Get Rich” at special library/office cottage near his house on the island of Mustique. I think he said it took him eight weeks to write. In the book he mentions a local cat coming into his house and feeding it milk and smoked salmon. The impression you get is that Dennis is isolated in his hideaway recounting his swashbuckling adventures at getting rich to us and the stray cat. Quite a few times he says he would swap all the riches he has for the chance to turn back time to when he was younger. In fact, he also says he would change what he did and earn his first 10-20 million by the age of 35, then sell up and start writing poetry and planting trees.

This strikes a chord with me. I’ll be 35 later this year. I may not have made 10-20 million, but I don’t really want to. I work for myself. I don’t answer to a boss. I basically earn what I want each year from my Internet business. I could grow the business, hire people, expand and try to make millions… but it would take time away from doing what I want to do right now… spending time with my wife and kids.

I’ll give you an example. I was reading Dennis’ book in my office at home today when my daughter walked in. This was about 2pm. She wanted to show me a leaflet which had been put through the door. We had a chat about it, then we fed the goldfish in my office. She’s 4 years old and almost ready to start school. When she does, I’ll miss her… so I’m enjoying the time right now when we can have fun together during the day.

Why would I want to work harder pursuing more money? What could it get me that I don’t have already? I’ve almost paid off my second mortgage in just five years. I live in a wonderful part of England. I work from home, working the hours I choose. I get to read books at home during the day with a cup of tea and my feet up. I’m at home during the day when my daughter wants to see me. My commute is a 10 second walk to my office. Most of my income at the moment comes from passive sources so I get to spend lots of quality time with my wife and children. Everyone says kids grow up so fast. Well, I’m making sure I spend as much time as possible with them while they’re young.

Dennis explains in his book that having lots of money actually brings a host of added responsibilities and worries… you have the job of looking after it, minimizing taxes on it, taking security precautions for your houses and loved ones, managing the people you hire to maintain your houses and gardens, family fights about money, jealous neighbours, fear of losing all your cash.

All that sounds too much like being famous to me… and that’s something I definitely never wanted. Lots of people say they want fame… just look at PopIdol, PopStars, Big Brother and all the other TV shows that attempt to make “celebrities” from “nobodies”. Yuck. They never seem to get anything more than their allotted 15 seconds of “fame”. Then there are the real celebrities, hounded from morning to night by the press and everyone wanting to know what they ate for breakfast. A true nightmare.

I guess, ultimately, it all comes down to defining what you want from life… then going after it until you succeed. If it’s fame or a huge pile of cash, good luck to you. Personally, my goals are simple… freedom from a boss, freedom from debt and enjoying what I have, right now. :-)

If you want to amass your own fortune, do yourself a huge favour and read Felix Dennis’ “How To Get Rich”. It’s a wonderful book by someone who can tell you from experience how to do it… in plain English, with a warm and witty writing style… and he won’t upsell you a DVD course or board game on “How To Really Get Rich” afterwards. :-)

Tradedoubler and Curry’s… an unhappy story for affiliates.

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

Check out this shocking information, hot off the press, from Tradedoubler, a UK affiliate network…


The Currys program will therefore end on the TradeDoubler network on 30th May 2007.

Until this date TradeDoubler has been instructed by DSG to change the commission structure on the Currys programs to:

1% on General Sales and
1% on Reserve and Collect Sales

These changes in commission are effective immediately.

Currys has been a merchant under the Tradedoubler program for SIX YEARS.

Now we learn that Dixon’s Stores Group (who own Dixons, Currys and, I think, PCworld) decided to “put their affiliate business out to tender” (according to Tradedoubler) and, “effective immediately” the commissions drop to 1% (wow, a STONKING 1%!) to be followed by the end of the Curry’s program (at Tradedoubler) on 30th May 2007.

Wow. An immediate slashing of commissions and four weeks notice that the program will end!

I had seriously considered a business driving PPC traffic to Curry’s products. I think, depending on volume, the affiliate commission was up to 4%.

I’m so glad I didn’t waste my time and effort writing effective PPC ads, designing and building quality landing pages and earning commissions that, despite a 6-year track record, went up in smoke “effective immediately”!

Edit: I just checked the Tradedoubler merchant area and they’re still listing the old info. Depending on volume, you could’ve been earning 3.5% commission… so affiliates earning that would see their commissions shrink by 2/3rds immediately and the program closing in 4 weeks. :-(

Tradedoubler say they’re aim is to “re-pitch for the business and we will do all we can to ensure we win the business back”.

Ha. Good luck with that, guys. And if you do win the account back, good luck getting any affiliates to sign up again.

StomperNet Relaunches…

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

… today at noon EST… and you can try it for 30-days for a dollar.

Not a bad deal. :-)

I don’t know if they’ve lowered the full membership price of $797 per month or not, but if you get a month’s access for a buck, you’ve saved $796. :-)