It means that Google considers those other results as almost idential and isn’t showing them, unless you specifically click to see them.

That’s why it’s so important, if you use duplicate content, to be the most relevant result for that content… usually the one with the most PageRank.

Neil.

In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 5 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.

I will do just that. I will post to my social bookmarking sites and tell my friends in forums.

I wonder why you didn’t add the popular social bookmarking site’s bookmarklets so that one will just click on it and submit?

But can I please answer my query here: http://www.neilshearing.com/2007/10/04/top-ten-ranking-at-google-with-plr-articles/

Please share the news… link to these posts!

Neil

I’d already made a comment on the previous article. Just to add that your article here gives me a great deal of JOY - now I can forget the scare and put your ideas into use.

Thanks man

Great video and information on understanding duplicate content. I wrote you an email last week but thought it would be more useful to start adding comments to your blog.

I really was unsure about the whole DC thing, but I see now why it isn’t such a problem after all.

I used to be concerned about writing an article for my blog and submitting the same article to an article directory like ‘Ezine Articles’, because of the duplicate content problem.

Now after your advice, I just submit away to the directories and it has already began to make a difference by bringing in more traffic.

Thanks again,

Peter

Thanks for the great information on duplicate content. Contrary to what some say, it does take time to read, understand, and rewrite plr articles so you don’t lose the meaning. Sometimes, changing a word here and there makes it a better read. But the whole duplicate content theme has been scary.

I appreciate you clearing it up.

Thanks,
Sandra