Comments on: Is Google Throwing Out Billions Of Pages? http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/ Neil Shearing's latest up-to-the-minute tips and secrets! Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:17:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Neil_Shearing http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/#comment-124513 Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:28:05 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/#comment-124513 Well, my thoughts are that Google may be shrinking their index to offer quality over quantity. They just don't want to admit that anyone else has a larger index for prestige reasons. My test wasn't exactly scientific, but I was hoping it would start a debate as to what's really happening. Neil. Well, my thoughts are that Google may be shrinking their index to offer quality over quantity. They just don’t want to admit that anyone else has a larger index for prestige reasons.

My test wasn’t exactly scientific, but I was hoping it would start a debate as to what’s really happening.

Neil.

]]> by: Makingyouricher http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/#comment-124489 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:16:51 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/#comment-124489 Neil, can you really depend on this search of yours as reliable? Don't you think Google may deliberately HIDEe the true numbers just to fool the public? Just my thought... Neil, can you really depend on this search of yours as reliable?

Don’t you think Google may deliberately HIDEe the true numbers just to fool the public?

Just my thought…

]]> by: James http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/#comment-124439 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:53:10 +0000 http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/01/16/is-google-throwing-out-billions-of-pages/#comment-124439 There's also no telling how google is interpreting the *-"a query. I wouldn't take these numbers very seriously. There’s also no telling how google is interpreting the *-”a query. I wouldn’t take these numbers very seriously.

]]>