<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank Decay OWNS You&#8230; Here&#8217;s Why&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing tips and strategies to boost your Internet marketing expertise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPC</title>
		<link>http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-140697</link>
		<dc:creator>EPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/#comment-140697</guid>
		<description>Google did file a patent to do with ageing about 2 yrs (or so) ago.

It&#039;s my feeling that a frequently updated site section - such as a blog - &quot;suffers&quot; an ageing algo.

Fresh content is picked up very quickly these days in Google - too quickly for it to percolate through all the algos. Over time, I&#039;ve noticed, a new page will eventually saunter down to its &quot;natural&quot; level, possibly dependent upon its inherent PR.

I have endured reading some of the patent and I&#039;m sure I remember it discussing certain page attributes such as changing on-page links and other &quot;snippet&quot; content surrounding the main (static) content. This, to me, alludes to links that &quot;fall&quot; from sitewide pages as they age (or get pushed down as new content is added).

When oil hits the news again, try [&quot;peak oil&quot;] in Google; last week it placed news media results above that SERPs&#039; natural organic SERPs - When I looked last night I noticed the news results slipping down due, IMO, to the ageing filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google did file a patent to do with ageing about 2 yrs (or so) ago.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my feeling that a frequently updated site section &#8211; such as a blog &#8211; &#8220;suffers&#8221; an ageing algo.</p>
<p>Fresh content is picked up very quickly these days in Google &#8211; too quickly for it to percolate through all the algos. Over time, I&#8217;ve noticed, a new page will eventually saunter down to its &#8220;natural&#8221; level, possibly dependent upon its inherent PR.</p>
<p>I have endured reading some of the patent and I&#8217;m sure I remember it discussing certain page attributes such as changing on-page links and other &#8220;snippet&#8221; content surrounding the main (static) content. This, to me, alludes to links that &#8220;fall&#8221; from sitewide pages as they age (or get pushed down as new content is added).</p>
<p>When oil hits the news again, try ["peak oil"] in Google; last week it placed news media results above that SERPs&#8217; natural organic SERPs &#8211; When I looked last night I noticed the news results slipping down due, IMO, to the ageing filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-140308</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/#comment-140308</guid>
		<description>This is really encouraging to me. I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll here the Google bashers (e.g. the gamers) shouting how unfair the monster is. But once again Google pays attention to the searcher which always helps the &quot;real&quot; businesses.

Clickbank has been doing this for years with the gravity measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really encouraging to me. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll here the Google bashers (e.g. the gamers) shouting how unfair the monster is. But once again Google pays attention to the searcher which always helps the &#8220;real&#8221; businesses.</p>
<p>Clickbank has been doing this for years with the gravity measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simple and Hands-On Internet Marketing Strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-139864</link>
		<dc:creator>Simple and Hands-On Internet Marketing Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/#comment-139864</guid>
		<description>Just downloaded the free Link Finder, looks FANTASTIC, will test it out and leave my comments, but it looks great!!
 
And a great blog by the way!

Thanks Neal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just downloaded the free Link Finder, looks FANTASTIC, will test it out and leave my comments, but it looks great!!</p>
<p>And a great blog by the way!</p>
<p>Thanks Neal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-139381</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neilshearing.com/2008/06/23/pagerank-decay-owns-you-heres-why/#comment-139381</guid>
		<description>No, in fact my pagerank has onnly gone up on some of my key sites.  I had noticed a drop earlier this year, but rankings didnt move from #1 spots.  Then again, they dont get more than 10k uniques a month, so maybe easier stuff like this doesnt count as much.

and yes, fresh continual link building is essential in my book of seo.   even though I may skip a year or two at a time on a given website.  also be aware that you have more and new competition every day, so that can reduce your PR/rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, in fact my pagerank has onnly gone up on some of my key sites.  I had noticed a drop earlier this year, but rankings didnt move from #1 spots.  Then again, they dont get more than 10k uniques a month, so maybe easier stuff like this doesnt count as much.</p>
<p>and yes, fresh continual link building is essential in my book of seo.   even though I may skip a year or two at a time on a given website.  also be aware that you have more and new competition every day, so that can reduce your PR/rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

