What a wonderful system the guys at SORBS (”Fighting spam by finding and listing Exploitable Servers”) are running.
Seriously.
They have my server (where I host the scamfreezone.com domain) on their email blacklist (also known as a realtime blacklist or rbl).
Why?
Because it’s in an IP-range that they received spam from.
—
Record Created: Sun Nov 5 23:52:32 2006 GMT
Record Updated: Mon Jan 26 12:56:10 2009 GMT
Additional Information: Received: from 65.182.186.215 (EHLO mailserver.wfhsecrets.com) (65.182.186.215) by server with SMTP; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 xx:xx:xx -0800
—
(note, the IP address listed as the spam source is NOT my server!)
My IP address is a dedicated IP address, unique to my server. It’s not my IP address that the spam came from, but one similar to it. SORBS have blocked a whole range of IP’s including the one they claim the spam came from.
That’s just terrific. It’s like saying, “because the guy in the house next to you sent out hate mail, you are guilty too”.
What rubbish.
My server is on NO OTHER realtime blacklists that I’ve checked… and I’ve checked over a hundred using this Multi DNS blacklist (DNSBL), Real-time Blackhole List (RBL) lookup and got the results… “Very Good: found in 1 RBL/DNSBL”.
Guess who that one is… SORBS.
It just gets better… the spam that SORBS has me on their list because of… was sent in November 2006!
You would think being on their blacklist probably isn’t important, right? Wrong. Some mail systems check the SORBS database. See…
—
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO::
host grey-area.mailhostingserver.com [209.62.85.74]:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [65.182.186.230] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received Recently See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?65.182.186.230
—
So how do you get OFF their RBL?
You’d think it was easy, right? Considering you didn’t actually send the spam you’re blacklisted for. You’d be wrong. It isn’t easy to get off the blacklist.
SORBS told me…
“You are an innocent party that has been included in a escalated listing because your provider is happy to host spammer(s) that have spammed a SORBS spamtrap or admin.
You are not required to make a donation for delisting as the entry was not generated because of your actions, however the listing will not be removed until your service provider terminates the spammers or makes the required donation.
Please take this issue up with your service provider and have them contact us directly, there is nothing you can do yourself to have this listing changed or removed.”
So I got my webhost to contact SORBS, and SORBS replied…
“We’ve explained what it takes to them. If they don’t like it, it’s up to them.”
You’ll notice SORBS mentions a “required donation”. Hmmm. Checking on that, you find that SORBS says, “The ‘fine’ was created to stop spammers from quickly removing themselves from the database. It also has the side effect of reminding people the hard way that they are responsible for their own actions.”
Interesting how they say, “responsible for their own actions”, but acknowledge that I’m an “innocent party”. What a wonderful system, eh?
The fine is $50 per spam received, and they say the “the easiest way” to pay it is to send the “donation” to “The Joey McNicol Legal Defense Fund”. What the heck is that? Some legal defense fund for an Australian? Coincidentally, SORBS seems to have an Australian connection in their domain name (au.sorbs.net). If you do send your donation there, SORBS says, “Payment here is usually immediate, and delisting usually takes place within 24 hours.” How handy is that?
Alternatively SORBS will, “accept nominations for good causes and charities to act as recipients instead” as long as that “good cause” is happy to send a receipt to SORBS (good luck with that!).
My final comment is to quote SORBS again…
“The one place the ‘fine’ will never go is to a SORBS admin or project. Comments have been made that SORBS should setup a trust and periodically donate the ‘fines’ to the nominated charities. This is currently not an option, pending legal advice, as it is likely this would cross the legal boundary of extortion or blackmail“.
(update: As I understand it, Joseph John McNicol complained about a company (The Which Company, trading as T3 Direct, a direct marketing company) spamming him, and the company took him to court in Australia claiming $40,000 in damages because the complaint resulted in them landing on the SPEWS blacklist. SORBS seems to be supporting the defense of Joseph John McNicol. Although why they’re still soliciting donations when Joseph John McNicol won the case in 2002, I don’t know. Perhaps they should state more explicitly that Joseph John McNicol won and that “Any unused amounts in this fund will be made available to defend other actions brought by spammers against people who fight spam”? (source)
(update 2: just found this link which calls SORBS “a fake blacklist”. Very interesting background on SORBS. The good news is that, “Only a few dozen sites have been found to use SORBS. They don’t use SORBS long.” Good. They also say, “If you are a SORBS Victim
Do not bother contacting SORBS. Contact the blacklist user by some other means, and ask them not to use SORBS”. Makes sense to me.)